Is there a God ?

for people asking questions about God

Philosophical arguments for the existence of God

A brief summary

For millennia, people have tried to formulate arguments to prove that God exists. Some arguments have fallen by the wayside, but others have been honed by centuries of discussion, updated by the latests scientific discoveries, and are still discussed today. Here are some of the best.

The arguments

The cosmological argument

The universe exists, but how can we explain this? What caused it? The cosmological argument argues that the universe could not cause itself or explain its own existence; neither could it have had an infinite life. The only logical conclusion, it is argued, is that it must, like everything else we know, have an external cause, and this external cause looks like God. The counter arguments try to show that an infinite or causeless universe is possible.

The teleological argument

The shape and characteristics of our universe are determined by a bunch of fundamental universal laws and the values of constants within those laws. Cosmologists have calculated that if these values had been even slightly different, life could not have formed and perhaps the universe would not exist at all after this time, or would be more like soup than the galaxies that we see. This argument looks at possible explanations to explain this 'fine-tuning', and concludes that the universe must have been designed. The counter arguments try to offer alternative explanations (e.g. that perhaps the underlying physics made our universe inevitable) or try to undermine the calculations of the improbability of our universe occurring by chance.

Still to come

The moral argument

The argument from reason

The ontological argument

The argument from religious experience and miracles

The argument from the historical Jesus

The argument (against the existence of God) from evil

What do these arguments prove?

Few people these days see these arguments as proofs, and few who oppose them see their counter arguments as disproofs. Instead, we may hope that the arguments show that one or the other view about God is reasonable, and hopefully more reasonable than the alternative view. If several arguments point in the same direction, the probability increases that their cumulative conclusion is correct.

Feedback

Was this page helpful to you?

Comment on this topic in the discussion section.

References

  • "Arguing for Atheism" by Robin Le Poidevin (1998).
  • "God, Reason and Theistic Proofs" by Stephen Davis (1997).
  • "Reasonable Faith" by William Lane Craig (2008).
  • "Atheism Explained" by David Steele (2008).
  • The Existence of God website.