A few days ago I looked at the number of christian denominations with different beliefs, as a first step to examining the argument that 40,000 denominations (as some said) showed that God couldn’t exist, or couldn’t get his act together.
I concluded that there were not nearly so many differences in beliefs as that figure suggested to some people. Now to see how this affects the argument.
If we expressed the argument formally, it would look something like this:
- If there was a God, he would reveal himself so clearly that christians would all have similar beliefs.
- Christians do not all have similar beliefs.
- Therefore it is unlikely that God exists.
It is clear that proposition #1 is the key. But how could it be justified? I suggest we need to answer four questions:
1. What beliefs should be clear?
The universe and our world show an enormous degree of diversity. People come in all sorts of colours and sizes, and with many different abilities and personalities. If God created this world, it seems he enjoys diversity. So the fact the christians do things differently and have minor differences in belief would hardly be evidence against God. So to support the argument, we would need to identify teachings which are crucial to the way we please God, obtain salvation and live in the world.
The really important matters, if christianity is true, are probably these:
- God as the powerful, loving creator.
- Jesus as the son of God and saviour, who taught, healed, died and was resurrected.
- Each one of us needs to respond to God, receive forgiveness through Jesus, and follow his teachings.
- The importance of the Bible, the Holy Spirit, meeting with other christians, sharing the good news and making a positive difference in the world.
2. What is an ‘unacceptable level’ of diversity?
I think this depends on what we think about God’s character and what he expects of us. If we see God as being controlling, demanding, severe and pedantic, then we might conclude that little diversity is allowed. But if we see God as loving, accepting, understanding and compassionate, then we might conclude that he is quite accepting of diversity, especially on less important matters. The former is the God rejected by many atheists (it is in many cases a caricature of the God portrayed in the Old Testament), but the latter is closer to the God revealed by Jesus and believed by christians
We might, however, at least expect christians to disagree in loving ways that accept that God allows diversity on many matters.
3. How different are teachings in these important areas?
To determine this would require a careful assessment of the teachings of the major denominational groupings noted previously, which I haven’t done – nor have I seen anyone else do it. But I would expect beliefs on these core matters to be reasonably common. The major diversity occurs with less important matters – views on healing, leadership, evolution, the end of the world, the nature of the authority of the Bible, how churches should be governed, the style of church meetings, sexual ethics, etc – matters which are not so crucial.
But it is clear that christians can be very divisive and disagreeable about many of these matters – some churches believe they are the one true church, and arguments about Calvinism, evolution, gay marriage, charismatic gifts, women ministers, etc, can get very heated and unedifying.
4. What is the cause of unacceptable diversity or unedifying disagreement?
If people have free will, they will sometimes exercise it wrongly. People disagree and argue about everything from politics to football teams. Human nature is surely a significant cause of the disagreements among christians, and it is shameful that christians don’t always rise above petty disagreements and unloving behaviour. But unless critics have an insight into God’s purposes, it is hard to see how they can blame God for the disagreements.
It is surely true that the inability of some christians to agree, or even tolerate disagreement, is a negative for the christian faith today. It is quite reasonable that non-believers will look at the church and be turned off. (At the same time, fairness also requires that critics recognise the good done by many christians, who volunteer and give to charity in greater numbers than non-believers.)
But using this to argue against the existence of God requires too many leaps. We don’t know how much freedom God wants to give people, but it seems to a large amount – he even seems to allow us to gradually come to an understanding of important matters. We don’t know exactly how God judges us, and we can’t avoid the fact that much of the problem can be blamed on obstinate human nature.
Thus sceptics have to make a number of assumptions to get the argument to work, which means it is based more on their own assumptions and expectations than anything else. Christians who believe God is very controlling and strict may find the argument has some impact (though they will likely blame human nature for the problems), but christians who believe God loves diversity and gives us a lot of freedom will likely remain unimpressed.
Summing up …
The argument has many holes in it. It will likely continue to be used by sceptics, but in a very vague form that hides the difficulties. But it is unlikely to make an impression on christians because it is so general. It probably confirms that one of the main differences between believers and unbelievers is the assumptions each makes.
Nevertheless, I believe christians divide and give themselves denominational-type names too easily. Jesus said his followers should be “one”, and many of these separate organisations are the result of serious divisions. It would be better if we emphasised what we have in common more, and worried less about these divisions.
Fortunately, a new christianity is already becoming visible, much more humble and less dogmatic, much more concerned about people’s welfare and the environment, much more inclusive and peaceful – in fact, much more like Jesus. Carpe diem!
JOINING A DENOMINATION?
What are the spiritual benefits of joining a denominational church?
1. Joining a denominational church does not bestow forgiveness of sins.
2. Joining a denomination does not grant you admission into the body of Christ.
3. Joining a denomination does not save anyone.
4. Joining a denomination does not make you part of the kingdom of God on earth.
The Scriptures do not speak of joining a denomination; nor do they tell us to join any church.
The Lord adds the saved to His church. You cannot join the Lord’s church. You cannot buy your way into the Lord’s church. You cannot inherit membership in the the Lord’s church.
THE LORD ADDS THE SAVED TO HIS CHURCH!
Acts 2:47 praising God and having favor with all the people. And the Lord was adding to their number day by day those who were being saved.
WHY WERE THEY BEING SAVED, AND ADDED TO THE CHURCH BY THE LORD HIMSELF?
A. They were being added because they believed the death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus Christ. (Acts 2:29-32)
B. They were being added because they accepted Jesus as Lord and Christ. (Acts 2:36)
C. They were being added because they obeyed the apostle Peter’s command to repent and be baptized in water. (Acts 2:27-38)
D. They were being added to the church because they believed Peter’s word and were baptized. (Acts 2:40-41)
The 3000 on the Day of Pentecost were added to the church by the Lord, because they were saved!
THEY DID NOT JOIN A DENOMINATIONAL CHURCH NOR WAS ANY CHRISTIAN IN THE FIRST CENTURY EVER TOLD TO JOIN ANY CHURCH OF ANY KIND!
THE LORD ADDS THE SAVED TO HIS CHURCH, YOU CANNOT JOIN IT!
Posted by Steve Finnell at 12:31 PM You are invited to follChristian blog at: steve-finnell.blogspost.com or you can google search, steve finnell a christian view.
He Steve, thanks for reading my blog. I have a lot of sympathy with your view, and a lot of criticisms of the denominational church too.
But it remains true that the Bible doesn’t say we should NOT join a church – it says we should keep meeting together and gives quite a bit of guidance about how to do it.
The scriptures don’t tell us to write blogs on the internet either, but you and I both do it! 🙂 (But I should mention that the URL you gave is not quite right.) Best wishes.
IT SEEMS it would be better if there were only One church..
But a few ideas should be considered.
First..It is God who controls who receives the Holy Spirit yet he gives it to people in various denominations
So what does that tell us right there?
Couldn’t God restrict his Spirit to only the churches he chooses? If the Holy Spirit was not found apart from one single church… everyone would have to belong to that One Church.
But God didn’t do that. So obviously God allows denominations.
Couldn’t God have chosen one leader in each generation throughout history and granted them the special status and miracle working powers he did with many of the Prophets…like with Paul, Moses, or Peter? These men backed up their word with the authority of God’s power
But God didn’t do that.
Now, while it seems it would be better for Christians if there were only One Church with an undeniable leader…it may not be better for current unbelievers.
Think about it. If the above conditions existed, it would be hard to deny Christianity was the only true religion–as every day on CNN the power of Moses could be displayed. Even if the leaders did not have this power–one perfect church with no disagreements could subvert free will and faith.
There must be a balance of proof vs doubt that God provides. If this were not so why isnt God on CNN? The current state of the churches allows unbelievers the freedom to claim the message is all just nonsense and leaves only those who truly seek God.
Im not, at all, saying God hiddenness is the sole cause, but it should be considered when asking these questions. Perhaps and maybe even certainly, the amount of people in heaven–that precise number–does not change one iota because of the current state of the church in the world. God will draw his people to Himself. But how that is done and what the state of the unbeliever, in relation to the saved, may be what is affected most–and maybe it must be this way.
Perhaps jesus commanded us His ideal Church but knew our freewill, our selfishness, and the unbelievers state of mind demanded something less than ideal.
Hi John, thanks for reading and commenting. I think I agree with most of what you say there. Thanks.
Comments are closed.