Book review: CS Lewis vs the New Atheists

March 27th, 2014 in clues. Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Book cover

I didn’t have high expectations of this book. I’m not that much interested in the so-called new atheists, nor in those who argue against them. And I think the world probably has quite enough books about CS Lewis.

But I am interested in the philosophical arguuments generally. And I am a great fan of Lewis – he was a very formative influence on me as a teen and young adult. So I thought I’d read the book more or less for old times’ sake.

I’m glad I did.

What has Lewis got to say in 2014?

After an introductory chapter to rebut some modern attempts to minimise Lewis’ capabilities as a thinker, author and philosopher Peter Williams addresses five aspects of Lewis’ thinking:

The Positively Blunt Sword of Scientism

Lewis and Williams are critical of “scientism”, science raised to the level of a philosophy with the claim that sciences can explain all questions, and anything it can’t explain is meaningless. They see this as the revival of the refuted philosophy of logical positivism ( which states that the only statements which have meaning are those which are empirically verifiable). They also critique what they see as the new atheists’ misrepresentation of religion and faith, which they often base on the worst cases they can find.

A Desire for Divinity?

CS Lewis’ Surprised by Joy outlines the way his ‘nostalgic longing’ for something beyond what the natural world seemed bale to offer led him on a journey to eventually find God. Williams discusses this experience, and turns it into a formal philosophical argument, which he tries to defend. I think this is less successful than when Lewis described his own experience rather than present a formal argument. But it remains true that some people, atheist or believer, feel that without God life is meaningless or less attractive – some accept this, others feel it is a spur to search for something more.

The Argument from Reason

This is probably the most philosophically well-developed of Lewis’ arguments – if natural processes alone are responsible for the human mind, and natural selection favours genes that increase survival and reproduction, how can we have any confidence that our abstract thoughts are true? Williams argues that neuroscience and the philosophy of mind assume naturalism, but then are unable to explain consciousness. He discusses the many objections to the argument, and the responses which appear to show suggests that naturalism has been unable to explain what we all experience.

The Problem of Goodness

Lewis argues that if the logical positivism which the new atheists generally follow is true, then no moral judgments can be true, or even meaningful, because they cannot be reduced to empirically verifiable propositions. We may be able to verify the outcomes of certain actions, but we have no basis for saying our judgment about their rightness is “true”. But most of us make moral judgment that we seem to believe are true, so they must come from something more than naturalism. Again Williams discusses all the objections and how Lewis’ thought addresses those objections.

Jesus in the Dock

Lewis is probably most widely known, and criticised, for the ‘trilemma’ (which he was not the first to state), that when Jesus claimed to be the son of God, he was either a deceiver, or deceived or truly divine. Some counter with the suggestion that Jesus could have been honestly mistaken, while others question the reliability of the New Testament texts about Jesus, especially the claims to divinity. Williams counters by referencing the historical evidence for Jesus, and arguing that no other hypothesis explains the facts as well.

Why I appreciated this book

If this book had been just what the title indicated – CS Lewis vs the new atheists – it would have been interesting to Lewis buffs, but of little value to others. But it is much more than that.

Peter Williams is a philosopher, so he adds plenty to the argument. But the best part of the book (for me) was the copious references and quotes, from “new” atheists, Lewis and other contemporary christians. It will be a useful reference for me.

Who should read it?

Anyone who wants to gain a broad understanding of contemporary thinking on these arguments.

The arguments haven’t gone away. Occasionally you find atheists saying that all these arguments have been refuted, but they haven’t. They haven’t been proven true either. They remain as matters for discussion by philosophers and ordinary people alike.

This ordinary person still finds them to varying degrees persuasive. Others do too, while others don’t. And so the discussion will continue.

Read more


  1. I have always felt it underhand to use any sort of philosophical reasoning to consider the veracity of the Christian god ( or any god ) in the absence of concrete verifiable evidence for Jesus as an historical character and more so as a divine being.

  2. Lewis is my favorite apologist. I love his down-to-earth style. Very readable. And even Antony Flew, back in his atheist days, was impressed with him. He does fall short, however, of convincing me to be a Christian.

  3. CS Lewis has been a favorite of mine too. I do think he continually struggled with his faith. I would dare say had he lived today, he might not have remained a Christian. Just my opinion.

    Here is a favorite CS Lewis quote ,”Perfect love, we know, casteth out fear. But so do several other things—- ignorance, alcohol, passion, presumption, and stupidity”. From his book, “The World’s Last Night”

    You probably won’t hear this quoted from the pulpit. 🙂

  4. Hi One Sceptic, thanks for visiting.

    G’day Doug, yes I always found him very readable. But I don’t think anyone can convince someone else to be a christian – I think a person has to decide for themselves.

    Hi Ken, you might be right. It’s also a pity that they crucified Jesus in his mid thirties, because he probably would have stopped believing in himself too later in life. And of course, Obama is really an atheist and not an American! 🙂

    And, you know, on my last visit to Texas (I have been there 3 times) I’m sure Elvis was pumping gas at the truck stop in Ellinger!

  5. Thanks for this. I like to read Lewis now and then and have I seen Peter Williams being praised as a stellar philosopher and defender of the Christian faith, so it was interesting to read about this book by the latter about the former.

    Though I’m not as impressed by Williams’s leanings to ID. I know this is less of an issue for you, but does the ID show?

  6. G’day, unkleE. I was echoing King Agrippa when the Apostle Paul testified before him: “Then Agrippa said unto Paul, Almost thou persuadest me to be a Christian” (Acts 26:28). I find Lewis much more persuasive in the case for belief in God than Christianity. But that’s me.

  7. Hi Doug, yeah, your Biblical allusion should have been obvious, but I am sometimes known to miss even the obvious! Sorry!

    Yes, I think the main arguments Lewis used, certainly the main ones raised in Williams’ book, address theism rather than christianity. But I find Jesus so fascinating, as well as “followable” and true, that the last step is not difficult for me. (Well, really it was the first step for me – I started with Jesus and then wondered if the more philosophical evidence backed it up.) But I understand it is very different for other people.

  8. G’day IgnorantiaNescia, I had a quick check, and ID is mentioned in one paragraph during the discussion of scientism and logical positivism, but he doesn’t argue for its truth. I don’t think it’s anywhere else.

  9. @unkleE , ” It’s also a pity that they crucified Jesus in his mid thirties, because he probably would have stopped believing in himself too later in life.”

    Now you’re being silly unkleE ! If he hadn’t died, he could not have come back for his people during their lifetime just like he said !

    Oooops ! 🙂

Comments are closed.