Behind the scenes at “Is there a God?”

January 9th, 2023 in About. Tags: , ,
Welcome, we are open

It’s a new year, so let’s get away from serious religion questions for one post.

Today, find out what’s been going on here at Is there a God?, and what’s in store this year. And trivia like how does the ancient city of Troy get a mention here?

All you need to know on a wet/cold/hot weekend in January!

Why start a blog about God?

Way back in 2006 I had the crazy idea that I could write stuff that would help open-minded people come to believe in God. For some reason I called it How to be happy. I think I wanted to avoid being too obvious.

For 6 years about 20 or so people a day came to read what I had written. You may think I would have been discouraged and think that I could better spend my time watching daytime television or something. 🙂 But I persisted through name changes, design changes and different web hosts. Somehow I hit a jackpot, and suddenly visit number started rising, until a decade after it began, about 250 people were visiting each day.

I’m not sure what they got out of it but I felt good! They were unreal days. 37 posts that year, 177 comments. I even ranked higher than NASA for people searching Google for “How did the universe start?” Google doesn’t always get it right!

But it couldn’t last, my little one-man website lost Google ranking over the next few years, and now I am back at about 50 visitors a day. I value each one! But I’d love to build back up a little.

Most popular posts

Lots of bloggers report their most popular posts of the year, but for me it is usually the one most people disagree with, so they come back again and again to discuss or argue.

On Is there a God?, permanent pages were more popular than the posts in 2022, the top ones being:

  1. Egyptian god Horus and Jesus
  2. Ten healings
  3. Did Moses really lead 2 million people across the Red Sea and into Canaan?
  4. 10 things we can all believe?

The things people search for

People who find their way to this site get here in curious ways sometimes.

  • The most common search term for people finding me via Google is “10 things you believe about religion”, or similar. I have a page 10 things we can all believe?, which probably isn’t what most of them are looking for (but then, it isn’t clear WHAT they are looking for). But Google seems to think the “10 things” is important, and so it sends them here. I wonder if I had found 9 things we can all believe whether I would have been so appealing!
  • This is where Troy comes in. Back in 2017 I wrote a post about history and legend, suggesting some parallels between our knowledge of the Mycenaean civilisation and Troy on the one hand, and the Old Testament on the other. It seems that quite a few people search for “Is Troy in the Bible?”, and Google sends them to that page. I don’t want to disappoint them, so I have now written a page Is Troy in the Bible to give them a definite answer.
  • I also noticed that lots of people are interested in the supposed similarities between Jesus and the Egyptian god Horus – some people have used these to suggest Jesus was invented. So again, I researched the matter and wrote up a quite detailed discussion of 16 alleged similarities and wrote Egyptian god Horus and Jesus. That remains one of my most visited pages, though more than half of those who express an opinion don’t like it. I guess they were looking for a different answer!

Some readers comment

Most readers don’t comment. I think they either find what they want, read it and depart the wiser (!!??), or they don’t find what they want and rush off to find something better.

Discussion vs argument

So the most likely to comment are those who strongly disagree – generally either atheists who think no-one sensible could believe in God or the resurrection, or christians who think no-one faithful to God could think there was no hell or that the Bible contains some errors. Those conversations can be enjoyable and worthwhile, but they rarely lead to any agreement and often end in argument, which I try to avoid.

But occasionally someone visits who wants to discuss politely and in a way where both sides can gain something. They are the most valued readers of all!

Comment spam

Spam is one of the hazards of a blog. Each day I get dozens of spam comments, but fortunately, WordPress filters most of them out. I occasionally check them out in the Trash, and never fail to be surprised at how someone spends computer time so wastefully. Here is a small sample of the many:

  • A decade ago a post on philosopher Peter Singer’s views on infanticide received this spam comment: “I want to talk about this page with my children.”
  • These days most spam seems to be in another language. Russian is by far the most common, but the subjects (when translated by Google Translate) are strange. For example, recently I received: “Appraisal of silver scrap and other silver products. Free consultation, pawnshop buying silver. Fast and free assessment”.
  • I received the following opportunity in Persian: “Learning how to clean permanent skin at home”. But I don’t think any of my skin is “permanent”!
  • Then in Chinese: “First Lending Network-Borrow money, small loan, small loan”.

Apparently about 95% of blog comments are spam, over 40% of all internet traffic comes from bots and about 80% of emails are spam. That fits with my experience. Apparently spam is mostly sent in the hope someone will click on the links which the spam comments contain.

Keeping on top of all this

I try to keep on top of all this. Researching what relevant subjects most interest people. Trying to make my website more visible on Google search. Using software to filter out spam. (If ever your comment hasn’t appeared, it may be because WordPress, and unkleE, don’t always get it right!)

The most popular pages and searches here relate to:

  • miraculous healing,
  • religious beliefs,
  • the historical evidence for Jesus and for the Old Testament,
  • what God is like,
  • how to have a fulfilled life, and
  • stories of people’s conversions.

So expect more on those subjects this year. Please let me know if there’s a topic you’d like me to cover.

When I decide to write on a topic, I typically Google dozens of sites, often 20 or 30, and utilise the half dozen or more that seem most authoritive and are most recent. From these I try to summarise the main ponts and give a brief but balanced assessment. I try to investigate all sides of the question.

I have a few new ideas. I’m going to explore the idea of a “Choose your own adventure” section where readers enter the discussion at the point they choose, and follow the path that their answers lead them into. It could be both fun and a challenge, especially for me trying to write it and code it.

I think fewer and fewer people are interested in intellectual arguments for the existence of God. Most people want to believe something that is livable and hopeful. And has intellectual credibility, not necessarily “proof”. Adapting this website to what is most helpful remains my aim.

Thanks for reading


I appreciate everyone who visits, especially those who subscribe. Thanks for sticking with me!

I hope you get value from reading. If you’d like to support me a little, please consider posting a link on Facebook or your own website to anything you read here that is helpful.

I hope 2023 is a good year for you!

Photo by Ketut Subiyanto

You may also like these


  1. “But it couldn’t last, my little one-man website lost Google ranking over the next few years, and now I am back at about 50 visitors a day. I value each one! But I’d love to build back up a little.”

    It’s likely a result of Google moving more and more away from PageRank, letting their index rot and getting in more aggressive intrusive advertizing and now more and more AI stuff. Google is declining. Many of their services are in decay.

  2. Hi, thanks for those thoughts. I am certainly open to the idea that Google is losing some of its shine. And I think like you that some of what they do is to gain advertising revenue more directly.

    But I’d be interested if you have a link on Google’s “index rot” decay in their services. Thanks.

  3. Hi, thanks for that. Those two articles were interesting and informative.

    Google is in an interesting position. Its supposed motto used to be “do no evil” but that can hardly be their motto these days. And now they have a stranglehold on web search, it must be tempting to control not just the advertising world, but the whole world, by biasing people’s reading to what Google wants them to think is true. But if they are too obvious, people will abandon them. So they walk a fine line I suppose.

    Anyway, I appreciate learning a little bit more about all this. Thanks.

  4. I don’t think Google’s so insidious and malicious. There just pretty greedy, and a bit dumb and lazy. They think it’s playing safe to put all their bets on advertising when they neglect the core product. But usually they manually remove stuff from their index when it’s really bad, like racist or illegal stuff. Removing older links from search results must be automated, likely in a drive for relevance.

    Yes, “do no evil” is dead, but it was stillborn. Google Books was an attempt to prevent a public alternative. If Google really wanted to do good, they could’ve shared their crawl with the Internet Archive after a delay. Alexa does that. Google just wanted to make money, and the ways were often questionable from the start.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *